Why
doesn't she just leave him?
Before
my first marriage ended in shambles, I used to wonder why people, usually women
stayed in controlling or abusive relationships. It seemed the most obvious
thing in the world, especially if there were no children involved. Generally it
was a woman married to a man who could not be satisfied by any of her efforts
to be a good wife. On occasion, nothing she tried kept him from getting so mad
that he felt a need to hit her, bite grab her ankle and swing her head and shoulders
against the wall like a bat (true story). Obvious solution? Grab your stuff,
get a lawyer and leave. Most common reasons given why women don't do that? He
might kill her and she has no idea where to go.
The
first one is an understandable fear, but, the media hype notwithstanding, the
percentage of controlling spouses who actually murder their partners is small.
I'm not down playing how horrific such a thing is or deny that it happens, but statistically it is not
a good reason not to leave. More importantly, people in fear for their lives
often do attempt to escape.
The
second objection to just leaving, she doesn't know where else to go, may have
been a factor fifty years ago, but most of the women I have known who were in
such relationships were well educated, well-liked, successful in their careers,
and well-traveled. In short, there was no way they couldn't find some place to
go.
Both of
these objections appeal to our sense of what makes sense and divert attention
away from blaming the victim, certainly a worthy motive, but perhaps misguide. Everyone I know in such a circumstance has told that they were (or are) trying to do the right thing by staying.
Like I
said, I used to subscribe to the above notions, until one day a friend said to
me, “Why don't you just leave?”
This
was in response to hearing about how unhappy my marriage was. For me there was
the likelihood that I would lose my children because fathers do not do well in
divorce when it comes to custody, but that was later and I knew she was going
to leave me as long as I stayed where I was. Before that, though, this question
from a concerned friend, perhaps the only one who even knew that things were so
bad, caught me off guard. I realized a few things immediately and a few more
things eventually. First, it occurred to me that to an outsider I was enduring controlling
relationship in much the same way some of my female friends were. At the same
time, aside from my kids, I had to wonder; why didn't I leave, or make
preparations sooner for the virtual certainty that she would? I didn't think
she'd kill me and I had options for other living arrangements. It took a long
time to piece together the logic behind control, but when I did, it made so
much sense and seemed almost brilliant in its simplicity. I could be wrong
about this, but I thought I would share it and see if this makes sense to my
billions of readers.
Most of
the people I know are by nature helpful and friendly. I have been blessed to be
surrounded by people of many faiths or no faith at all who step up when there
is a need for their help. I like to think that I am such a person. It dawned on
my very slowly that when I help a person, there seems to be a need for some
kind of feedback that says one of four things.
1.
Thank-you, that was helpful.
2.
Thank-you, that was not helpful.
3.
Thank-you, please keep helping me.
4. I
don't need or want your help.
To be
clear, this is not about needing gratitude but about being informed about
whether or not my help was useful, still needed, or not even wanted. The
message needed to be that my help was finished or not. The same thing was true
of my efforts to help cheer up my first wife when she was in a bad mood. The
underlying instinct for the need for this feedback seems to come from a sense
of obligation to help others because we are all connected by compassion and
mutual needs. Put simply we have a duty to be of use to each other that is
grounded in our capacity for empathy. The greater a person's capacity for
empathy, the greater the sense of duty they will feel. Empathy consists of two
elements; the first is the ability to feel vicariously the pains and joys of
other people and the desire to alleviate pain and augment joy in other people.
But
what if you are trying to be helpful to someone who is not connected to you by
means of empathy but who sees you as a tool or a plaything. Such people are
hard to recognize even at times for experienced psychologists. Such people are
much more common than you might think. Worst of all, such people have a genius
for using your kindest instincts against you. I realized that in my first
marriage that virtually everything I ever did for my wife regardless of whether
or not she said thank-you, was also met with some kind of comment or signal to
indicate that it wasn't really enough. Or was too much. Or was the wrong
things. On some level, I was still obligated, not only to keep trying, but to
make up for the successive failures that piled up almost daily over the years.
They on the other hand simply need to lead you along with a tiny carrot –
possibility that one day you will be good enough, or occasionally pull out that
stick to beat you with the guilt of not being good enough yet.
See the
genius? The control of another is accomplished best by getting that other to
keep trying to measure up. The person
being controlled does almost all the work necessary to keep that control in
place. That stick I mentioned for the bit of guilty beating is often just one
rhetorical question, with a myriad of variations based on the change of one
word.
“What
kind of a _________ wouldn't help someone who really needs it?”
That
blank can be filled with any word that encapsulates what you believe to be your
best qualities; man, father, husband, wife, mother, sister, Christian, Jew,
Catholic, neighbour, and so on and so on....” And so you double your efforts to
prove you are a dutiful or loving or kind or dedicated etc. man, father,
husband, wife, mother, sister, Christian, Jew, Catholic, neighbour, and so on
and so on....
The
controller says one sentence, but the controlled adjusts everything in his or
her life to accommodate the controller because the controlled believes it to be
his or her responsibility to do whatever it takes to make things right.
The
controlled feels they are doing something virtuous. This is a lie. And it is a
cherished lie. And it usually crumbles slowly until a wearied victim realizes
not only that they resent having made this effort for someone who will never reciprocate in any way, but also that the love that motivated this prolonged
effort had long since died.
Then the controlled no longer feels they are doing
something virtuous. They just
feel foolish.
And nobody, male or female, wants to be a fool.